tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18223796.post7486126970617542787..comments2024-03-27T07:30:49.184+01:00Comments on The learning & technology blog: blip.tv for developmentUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18223796.post-76633622864127039072007-07-21T15:57:00.000+02:002007-07-21T15:57:00.000+02:00Hiya, yes, its the download feature which is absen...Hiya, yes, its the download feature which is absent in youtube.. I think this is interesting in design for broadband- not for southern contexts- I do believe there is lots of scope of customized design for the south, but in the meantime we can also screen what of the other stuff works..Joitskehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09087406142343521335noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18223796.post-3977930448835873282007-07-20T11:41:00.000+02:002007-07-20T11:41:00.000+02:00Oh wait, I misunderstood 'download'! :>That is def...Oh wait, I misunderstood 'download'! :><BR/>That is definetly a nice feature!<BR/>NynkeNynke Kruiderinkhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10656738989647450491noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18223796.post-40202651096253388102007-07-20T11:39:00.000+02:002007-07-20T11:39:00.000+02:00Sounds great! Any ideas what the reason for this m...Sounds great! Any ideas what the reason for this might be? If the video's they're servicing are the same, then it's possibly a matter of streaming speed, webserver capacity, mirror servers hosted locally/regionally...? Ideas anyone? <BR/>I wonder if it's a matter of, if blip tv becomes as popular as YouTube, it might not perform as well anymore either. If so let's keep this a public secret. :>Nynke Kruiderinkhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10656738989647450491noreply@blogger.com